Flexidao recently co-authored an analysis of the GHG Protocol's draft Scope 2 revisions, modeling how the proposed shift from annual to hourly matching and tighter deliverability boundaries would affect corporate renewable portfolios across four buyer archetypes. The core finding: most companies would see reduced eligible market-based coverage under current conditions, not because their physical consumption changed, but because their existing instruments fail the new temporal and geographic criteria. This conversation uses that analysis as a starting point to explore three practical questions: (1) Where do current portfolios break under the proposed criteria? (2) How do the grandfathering, threshold exemption, and feasibility provisions actually affect your exposure timeline? (3) What should procurement and data infrastructure decisions look like now, before the final rules land?